图片探花 眼睛妹

期刊简介

图片

《欧洲海外关联杂志》（European Journal of International Relations）无为地代表了已在欧洲发展的海外关联规模。自1995年创刊以来，该杂志已成为海外关联学界一个要害而独处的声息。它以其欧洲发源为基础，经过二十多年的发展，已成为海外关联界最好斥逐的缩影，包括前沿的表面诡辩、现代和曩昔的学术热门以及表面丰富的实证分析。

本期目次

1

说念德地位——东说念主类地位？议论大规模暴力事件中说念德与非东说念主化之间的计划

Moral status – human status? Interrogating the connection between morality and dehumanisation during mass violence

2

民众非正义和本色不安全的产生

Global injustice and the production of ontological insecurity

3

转型性方针？性别众人与技巧官僚的和平

Transformative indicators? Gender expertise and technocratic peace

4

议论集合国维和行径对东说念国对外事务的影响

Exploring the impact of United Nations peacekeeping operations on the external affairs of host states

5

西方对中国海外基础法度融资的替代有运筹帷幄为何失败

Why the West’s alternative to China’s international infrastructure financing is failing探花 眼睛妹

6

成员国退出何时会导致海外组织的沦一火？

When do member state withdrawals lead to the death of international organizations?

内容节录

说念德地位——东说念主类地位？议论大规模暴力事件中说念德与非东说念主化之间的计划

题目：Moral status – human status? Interrogating the connection between morality and dehumanisation during mass violence

作家简介：Torsten Michel，布里斯托大学海外关联高等讲师。主要盘考酷好酷好在于海外关联（元）表面和大规模暴力的政事与伦理，尤其和蔼冲突时间和冲突后信任的作用，以及非东说念主化的见地偏执在大规模暴行中的性质和功能。

节录：从20世纪70年代的早期盘考运转，非东说念主化冉冉成为交融大规模暴行发生的基本能源和条目的一个要害特征。永远以来，一种广为袭取的主导不雅点觉得，说念德地位的丧失曲直东说念主化历程中的要道组成身分，觉得受害者被打消在义务的说念德范围以外，冲突了说念德壁垒，从而使得某些蹂躏样貌突破了东说念主类群体中既有的暴力表率。本文以大屠杀这一典型案例为参照，批判性地质疑了迄今为止将丧失说念德地位等同于非东说念主化这一碎裂置疑的不雅点。总体而言，本文主张对非东说念主化的表自便使用和分析性使用进行更良好的区分，需要对其训导性酣畅和计划性进行更详备的反想，并对其见地基础进行更为批判的议论。这么作念不仅大略鞭策非东说念主化盘考特殊面前的情状，还能使咱们大略更长远地评估其在大规模暴力事件中的用途、意旨偏执要害性。

Beginning with early studies in the 1970s, dehumanisation has become a key feature in attempts to grasp the fundamental dynamics and conditions under which mass atrocities emerge. One of the most long-standing, prominent and widely accepted conceptions sees the loss of moral status as a key constitutive component of processes of dehumanisation, suggesting that the victims’ exclusion from the moral universe of obligation breaks down moral barriers, enabling forms of persecution outside the established practices of violence among human communities. With reference to the paradigmatic case of the Holocaust, this article critically interrogates this so far unquestioned equation of a loss of moral standing with dehumanisation. Overall, it argues for a much more nuanced differentiation between normative and analytical uses of dehumanisation, the need for more detailed reflections on its empirical appearances and relevance, and a more critical engagement with its conceptual grounding. Doing so will lead dehumanisation research beyond its current state and would allow for a more intricate assessment of its uses, meanings and relevance in cases of mass violence.

民众非正义与本色不安全的产生

题目：Global injustice and the production of ontological insecurity

作家简介：Adam B. Lerner，马萨诸塞大学洛厄尔分校政事学副教师。

节录：本文提议，再行和蔼占主导地位的海外旧例何如产生本色层面上的不安全，有助于将本色安全盘考（OSS）更好大地向宇宙政事中的不公道，极度是当它在多个层面上影响结构旯旮化的政事步履者时。本盘考将伊里斯-马里恩·扬（Iris Marion Young）的盘考斥逐，极度是她对于正义是放弃总揽和压迫的表面引入本色安全盘考，从而提议了这一论点。本文鉴戒杨的“压迫的五面性”表面，觉得海外体系中多半存在的多重非正义应被交融为海外体系中本色不安全的主要着手，它们不仅平直松开身份的闲隙性，还拦阻了处于颓势的步履体追求本色安全的实践。在海外层面，这些历程特殊单一分析档次，以不同的形式影响着个东说念主、社会群体致使国度。将扬的表面纳入本色安全盘考，不仅有助于在政事表面和海外关联这两个经常分离的子学科之间确立要害计划，还能为学者提供更长远的表面框架，议论海外体系非正义何如频频导致本色不安全。著作终末提议，本色安全盘考应进行表自便转向，想考民众正义是否应被视为多个共存步履体寻求本色安全的前提条目。

This article argues that a renewed focus on how dominant international practices produce ontological insecurity can help better orient ontological security studies (OSS) to injustice in world politics, particularly as it affects structurally marginalized political actors at multiple levels. It makes this case by bringing the work of Iris Marion Young to bear on OSS, particularly her theory of justice as the elimination of domination and oppression. Drawing on Young’s “Five Faces of Oppression,” this paper argues that multiple injustices endemic to the international system should be understood as key producers of ontological insecurity in the international system, both in their direct ability to destabilize identities and in their undermining of disadvantaged actors’ ontological security-seeking practices. On international scales, these processes transcend levels of analysis, affecting individuals, social groups, and even states in differing ways. Incorporating Young’s work into OSS not only helps build a vital bridge between the oft estranged sub-disciplines of political theory and IR, but also can provide scholars a means of better theorizing how ontological insecurity is so often a product of the international system’s injustices. The paper thus concludes by proposing a normative turn within OSS, asking whether global justice should be understood as a precondition for ontological security-seeking among multiple co-existing actors.

转型性方针？性别众人与技巧官僚的和平

题目：Transformative indicators? Gender expertise and technocratic peace

作家简介：Laura McLeod，英国曼彻斯特大学海外政事学高等讲师。她的盘考包括性别、女权主义、安全以及冲突后的和平确立。

节录：在曩昔十年中，使用方针来跟踪海外和平确立和维和技俩、政策与实践的执行情况日益多半。好多学者品评这些方针具有技巧官僚化、模范化及殖民化的效应。然则，本文从不同的角度进行议论：方针能带来变革吗？现代对方针的品评泛泛将其视为孤苦孤身一人、去情境化的官僚器具，冷落了开辟、使用和颠覆方针的东说念主类主体的复杂性。本文将方针界说为一种强有劲的性别化学问坐蓐技巧，既可被轨制步履体开辟、使用，也可被他们颠覆。本文通过对轨制步履体的访谈以及集合国通告长评释的分析，探究了26个方针之一的发展历程，该方针用于料到集合国“妇女、和平与安全”（WPS）议程的执行情况。所盘考的方针跟踪了集合国维和与极度政事任务中聘请高等性别众人的数目。2010年至2020年间，围绕这一方针的施展、妙技和场地的评释揭示了集合国中提倡变革的女性主义者所采用的策略和收拢的契机，鞭策了WPS议程的长远执行。尽管方针有固化新解放主义表率的风险，但冷落其开辟、使用或颠覆方面的后劲无疑是一种满足，戒指了兑现实质性变革的契机。

In the last decade, the use of indicators to track implementation of international peacebuilding and peacekeeping programmes, policies and practices has proliferated. Indicators are criticised by many scholars for their technocratic, standardised and colonialising effects. This article follows a different line of inquiry. Can indicators be transformative? Contemporary critiques place indicators as bureaucratic artefacts in a vacuum, detached and decontextualised from the nuances of human agency developing, utilising and subverting them. I conceptualise indicators as powerful gendered technologies of knowledge creation developed, used and subverted by institutional actors. Using interviews with institutional actors and United Nations (UN) Secretary-General Reports, I trace institutional stories of one indicator (out of 26) developed to capture implementation of the UN Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda. The indicator investigated tracks the number of senior gender experts employed within UN Peacekeeping and Special Political Missions. Stories of progress, skill, and location in the reporting of this indicator between 2010 and 2020 highlight strategies deployed and opportunities taken by feminist-change advocates within the UN to prompt a deeper implementation of the WPS agenda. While indicators hold the danger of reinforcing neoliberal norms, the failure to conceptualise the potential for developing, utilising and/or subverting the indicators smacks of hubris, limiting opportunities for meaningful transformation.

议论集合国维和行径对东说念国对外事务的影响

题目：Exploring the impact of United Nations peacekeeping operations on the external affairs of host states

作家简介：Richard Caplan，牛津大学政事与海外关计划海外关联教师。John Gledhill，牛津大学海外发展系民众治理副教师。Maline Meiske，牛津大学政事与海外关计划博士后盘考员。

节录：集合国（UN）维和行径（PKOs）的盘考泛泛很少和蔼东说念国发展的一个要害方面——对外事务。本文聚焦于冷战后时期的集合国维和行径，旨在议论集合国维和行径何如影响东说念国的对外事务。咱们通过对集合国维和行径要道文献的定量内容分析，细目了集合国和蔼的东说念国对外事务的具体方面。接着，本文提议一个见地框架，区别出维和行径对东说念国对外事务极度具影响力的三个规模：关联构建、轨制与大意才能确立以及政策制定。咱们识别了维和行径影响东说念国对外事务的三条旅途：授权脚色、自主行径以及无意后果。伙同文献分析和原创访谈数据，本文以东帝汶和利比里亚这两个比年来遴聘过大规模集合国维和任务的两个国度为例，阐释了该见地框架的执行应用。

Studies of United Nations (UN) peacekeeping operations (PKOs) typically give scant attention to an important aspect of host states’ development: their external affairs. This article identifies ways in which UN PKOs can shape the external affairs of host states, focusing on UN peacekeeping in the post-Cold War period. We present the findings of a quantitative content analysis of key UN peacekeeping documents to establish which aspects of host state external affairs have been of concern to the UN. We then provide a conceptual framework that maps three areas of external affairs in which PKOs are particularly influential: relationship-building; institution- and diplomatic capacity-building; and the shaping of policy in domains of external affairs. We identify three pathways through which PKOs shape the external affairs of host states: mandated roles, improvised actions, and unintended consequences. Drawing on documentary analysis and original interview data, we illustrate our conceptual framework through an exploration of the impact of peacekeeping on the external affairs of two countries that have hosted large-scale UN-led peacekeeping missions in recent decades: Timor-Leste (East Timor) and Liberia.

西方对中国海外基础法度融资的替代有运筹帷幄为何失败

题目：Why the West’s alternative to China’s international infrastructure financing is failing

作家简介：Shahar Hameiri，昆士兰大学政事学与海外关联学院的海外政事学教师，澳大利亚盘考理事会畴昔盘考员，他的主要盘考东亚和太平洋地区的安全与发展问题。Lee Jones，伦敦玛丽女王大学政事经济学与海外关联教师。他的盘考重心是政事经济、安全、治理、主权和扰乱，尤其是在东亚。

节录：跟着地缘政事竞争加重，西方国度试图与中国的“一带一齐”倡议（BRI）竞争。然则，民众基础法度的资金动员依然不及，标明西方国度难以挑战中国在此规模的主导地位。为什么会这么？通过对中国和好意思国的相比政事经济分析，本文觉得，单靠地缘政策想维的国度经管者无法创造信得过的竞争力。国度的上风和颓势根植于结构性政事经济动态。当国度经管者的野心恰当或反应雄壮社会力量偏执所掌控的成本和坐蓐力的利益时，经常会产生强有劲的影响。这在中国尤其彰着，其倡议主如若为经管工业多余和成本过度蓄积问题提供空间和时辰上的鼎新器具。违反，当地缘政事抱负与势力集团的利益和物资现实脱节时，效果经常乏善可陈。这少量适用于好意思国，其本性是基础法度老化、工业空腹化以及占主导地位的金融部门对基础法度基本不感酷好酷好。尽管好意思国国度经管者已转向加大对国内基础法度的插足，但在海外上，西方不时遴聘的新解放主义作念法仍然依赖于动员私东说念主成本参与基础法度投资这一照旧失败的作念法。

As geopolitical rivalry intensifies, Western states have moved to compete with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). However, the mobilisation of funds for global infrastructure remains paltry, suggesting that Western states cannot contest Chinese dominance here. Why? Through comparative political economy analysis of China and the United States, we argue that serious competition cannot be willed into being by state managers thinking geostrategically. States’ strengths and weaknesses are rooted in structural political economy dynamics. Where state managers’ plans jibe with, or express, the interests of powerful social forces and the capital and productive forces they command, a powerful impact results. This is true of China, whose BRI is principally a spatio-temporal fix for industrial overcapacity and over-accumulated capital. Conversely, where geopolitical ambitions are divorced from powerful groups’ interests and material realities, results are lacklustre. This applies to the United States, characterised by infrastructural decay, industrial hollowing-out and a dominant financial sector largely disinterested in infrastructure. Although US state managers are turning towards increased state spending on domestic infrastructure, internationally, the West’s continued neoliberal approach still relies on the already-failed approach of mobilising private capital into infrastructure investment.

成员国退出何时会导致海外组织的沦一火？

题目：When do member state withdrawals lead to the death of international organizations?

作家简介：Inken von Borzyskowski，牛津大学海外关联学教师。她的盘考侧重于海外关联的国内务治，重心是海外组织偏执对国内冲突和选举的影响。Felicity Vabulas，佩珀代因大学海外盘考副教师。她的盘考重心是海外组织的政事经济学和异邦游说。

节录：

近来的盘考和蔼到列国对海外组织（IOs）的反弹，包括成员国退出是否会影响海外组织的存续。因此，咱们提议问题：成员国退出何时会导致海外组织的沦一火？咱们对退出与海外组织沦一火之间存在多半关联抓怀疑格调，因为泛泛单个成员国并非海外组织活命的要道。此外，退出经常是由于个别成员国的偏好与其他成员产生不对，这些留存成员可能在退出后集合在一说念，从而确保致使延迟海外组织的存续。即使是多个国度的退出，也巧合导致海外组织的沦一火，因为一个较小的成员团体可能更易克服集体行径的挑战。然则，要害成员的退出可能会因资源、阛阓影响力和携带的缺失而影响组织的存续。咱们诈欺活命模子，对1909至2014/2020年时间532个海外组织的退出数据进行测试，并通过案例分析阐明其动态。斥逐提拔咱们的不雅点：退出总体上并不导致海外组织的沦一火，但独创成员的退出可能加快其沦一火。风趣风趣的是，经济实力较强的国度的退出似乎有助于海外组织的存续（泛泛通过更动和/或再行加入兑现）。这些发现存助于更好地交融海外组织的人命周期，以及海外互助的韧性和脆弱性。

Recent research has drawn attention to states’ backlash against international organizations (IOs), including whether member state withdrawals affect the longevity of IOs. We therefore ask when do member state withdrawals lead to the death of IOs? We are skeptical of a general link between withdrawal and IO death because on average, any one member is not critical for the survival of an IO. Also, withdrawal is often driven by one member state’s preferences diverging from remaining members; these remaining states may band together after withdrawal, ensuring or even enhancing the longevity of the IO. Even withdrawal by several states may not contribute to IO death because a smaller group of remaining members may better overcome collective action challenges. Nonetheless, exit by an important member may affect IO survival by removing resources, market power, and guidance. We test these arguments using survival models on an original dataset of withdrawals across 532 IOs from 1909 to 2014/2020 and illustrate the dynamics with case vignettes. The results support our arguments: withdrawals in general do not lead to IO death but the withdrawal of founding members can speed IO death. Interestingly, withdrawal by economically powerful states seems to facilitate IO survival (often through reform and/or re-entry). These findings contribute to a better understanding of the lifecycle of IOs as well as to the resilience and vulnerabilities of international cooperation.

色无极影院

编译 | 束任翔

审校 | 张潇文

排版 | 杨语灵

本文源于《欧洲海外关联杂志》（EJIR） Vol. 30, No. 3, 2024,本文为公益共享探花 眼睛妹，做事于科研素质，不代表本平台不雅点。如有松驰，迎接指正。

本站仅提供存储做事，所有这个词内容均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权内容，请点击举报。